
Nearly £900m of tenants’ deposits
has been safeguarded under the
Government’s tenancy deposit
protection scheme in its first year, recent
figures show.
More than half of this amount has
been protected by the Tenancy Deposit
Scheme, (TDS) of which most ARLA
agents are members. As we reported in
our last issue, the TDS covered nearly
450,000 tenancies, housing close on
700,000 tenants in property owned by
335,000 landlords. These figures are
rising by an average 7.5% a month.
The Government’s figures revealed that a
total of 1m deposits have been protected
at a rate of more than 2,500 a day since
the scheme started on April 6, last year.
Under the rules, landlords and agents
have a legal duty to sign up to one of
three Government-backed schemes
when they take a deposit for a new
assured short-hold tenancy.
Housing and Planning Minister
Caroline Flint said:
“With the average deposit now nearly
£1000, the changes we have made
mean thousands of tenants no longer
risk waving goodbye to their cash.
We want to ensure bitter disputes
between tenants and landlords are
a thing of the past. The new rules we
have brought in achieve this by striking
a fairer balance between the rights of
both parties.”
There are 1.7m assured short-hold
tenancies, to which tenancy deposit
protection applies, accounting for just
under one in twelve of all households
in England (2005/06).
Landlords not protecting a deposit taken
since 6 April 2007 are committing a
civil offence, which could lead to them
having to pay tenants three times the
value of the deposit and forfeit their
right to possession of their property.
Meanwhile, the Government approved
custodial scheme; The Deposit
Protection Service (DPS), says that
tenants and landlords will be on the
receiving end of £2.5 million in interest
as the tenancies currently protected by
the service come to an end.
The DPS works by holding a tenant’s
deposit, free of charge, for the term of
the tenancy agreement. At the end of the
rental period, the deposit, and a portion
of the interest it has accumulated, is
paid back to whoever is entitled to it –
tenant or landlord, depending on the
condition of the property and the terms of the rental agreement. The remaining
interest is used to fund the service.
“Prior to the new legislation, it was very
rare for tenants to receive any interest
on their deposits,” said Kevin Firth,
Client Services Director for The DPS.
The DPS has protected deposits
submitted by some 84,000 landlords,
with a total of approximately £185
million deposits, equating to more than
250,000 rental agreements. The DPS
has also successfully introduced an
effective dispute resolution service.
“We encourage landlords and tenants
to seek mutual agreement on the return
of the deposit, but recognising that this
is not always achievable, the Alternative
Dispute Resolution (ADR) service has
been introduced,” Kevin says.
“Feedback on the ADR process has
been very positive, with both tenants and
landlords welcoming an independent
ruling on whether there is any factual
or contractual basis for retaining all or
part of a tenant’s deposit.”
Of the deposits protected with The DPS
just 40 cases have needed to be resolved
through ADR and only three disputes have
been resolved through the county courts.
“While we receive around 200
new registrations from landlords
and agents each day, The DPS has
anecdotal evidence that there are still
a large number choosing to ignore the
legislation, either by not taking deposits
or putting the deposits in their back
pockets”, commented Kevin.
What is a deposit?
Lawrence Greenberg from The Tenancy Deposit Scheme answers a surprising frequently asked question
We often get asked to define a
deposit for the purposes of
tenancy deposit protection.
Any money taken for security in
respect of a tenant’s obligations or
liabilities connected with the tenancy
must be secured in a TDP scheme.
This includes any extra payments
where the intention is to hand them
back to the tenant if there is no call
to retain them.
Rent paid in advance is not a deposit.
But a deposit paid as a “rent deposit”
is a tenancy deposit under Section
212(8) of the Housing Act 2004,
and, therefore, must be protected in
an authorised scheme.
An administration fee paid to the
landlord with an expectation that all
or any of it will be refunded at the
end of the tenancy must be treated
as a tenancy deposit and protected
under a scheme.
If, however, it is non-refundable,
it is not a deposit. This may occur
where, for instance, a fee is charged
for repairs or the replacement of
broken items which normally would
get deducted as expenses from the
tenant’s deposit, but which, according
to the tenancy agreement, will be
repaired or replaced at the landlord’s
own expense
A holding deposit is not a tenancy
deposit for the purposes of section
212 of the Housing Act 2004 and
will not be required to be held under
an authorised Scheme. A deposit
is only required to be placed in a
scheme if it is money held which is
paid as security for the performance
of any obligations of the tenant or
the discharge of any liability of his,
arising under or in connection with
the tenancy.
So if the tenancy agreement has not
been entered into, or there are no
contractual obligations resting on the
tenant when s/he pays the holding
deposit, the deposit paid is not a
deposit for the purposes of the Act.
However, if a landlord has a holding
deposit in respect of a person who
subsequently becomes his tenant,
then the landlord must either return
the holding deposit to the tenant (so
that the tenant can give it to him again
as a tenancy deposit) or retain it, and
protect it in a scheme within 14 days
of the tenant agreeing to enter into
a tenancy (i.e. from the date that the
holding deposit becomes a tenancy
deposit).
You might find it helpful to put a
clause in your documentation
which defines the event(s)
which constitute the transformation
of a holding deposit into a tenancy
deposit, and commits you to putting
the relevant details on the tenancy
database within 14 days thereof. At
that date you would also serve the
prescribed information on the tenant,
if you hadn’t already done so.