Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT)
publication date: Sep 18, 2006
Recent reports have shown that the
annual Government take from
Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) has
now reached £4 billion, with the latest
quarter’s figures to June 2006 up 30%
to £1 billion from the previous quarter’s
£773.9 million
With the average SDLT liability now
£3,735, Nick Haines, Tax Director at
Hazlewoods LLP, considers the effect
the introduction of SDLT has had on
homebuyers, and offers some solutions to
reduce its burden.
In the Beginning…..
Stamp Duty Land Tax (SDLT) was ushered
in by the Government on 1 December
2003, although most will not have
noticed a difference from the old Stamp
Duty regime.
There were a couple of key changes that
may have raised the odd eyebrow for a
property buyer, most notably that the
responsibility for the tax had suddenly
moved from the solicitor acting on the
buyer’s behalf, to the buyer.
Rather than their solicitor handling all the
paperwork and corresponding with the
tax office, all of a sudden a purchaser
would have to sign a Land Transaction
Return signifying that all the information
contained in it was complete and accurate.
If the Return is held to be inaccurate or late, penalties can be levied, and it is the
buyer who will pick them up.
This, in itself, whilst a notable change, is no
different to the way the Government has
dealing with tax for years, having already
changed Income Tax and Corporation Tax
to a Self Assessment regime. SDLT was
just catching up.
The second change was the fact that the
nil rate band was different for residential
and non residential properties. The smart
money would have been that, to help first
time buyers on the property ladder (with
ever increasing property prices), the nil
rate band for residential would be higher.
Perhaps we should not have been
surprised, therefore, when the Government
went completely the opposite way and set
the nil rate band for residential property at
£60,000 (the same as with Stamp Duty)
but increased it to £150,000 for non
residential. Who needs to help first time
buyers?!?
Where we are now……..
Now, with a couple of increases in the nil
rate bands over the past two years, the
limits stand at:
Residential £125,000
Non Residential £150,000
Above these bands, the rates of SDLT
payable are the same for residential and
non residential:
Between nil rate and £250,000 1%
Between £250,000 and £500,000 3%
Over £500,000 4%
Perhaps the strangest aspect (and most
unfair) about SDLT is the way the rates
are applied. With other taxes (Income,
Capital Gains and Inheritance Tax), you
will always benefit from the nil rate band.
Perversely, as soon as you exceed the nil
rate band, the whole value of the property
is subject to SDLT at the rates above.
Is it any wonder, therefore, that some of
the slowest moving properties are those
valued at just over £125,000, £250,000
and £500,000. A £1 increase in property
value from £250,000 to £250,001 can
result in an increase in SDLT of £5,000 for
the buyer. Some buyers may be tempted
to appoint a certain level of consideration
to fixtures and fittings to bring the
amount subject to SDLT to below various
thresholds. However, HMRC are aware
of this trend, so do not be surprised if an
enquiry is rained. The consequence of this
is that many properties with a true value
of £265,000 will only sell for £250,000,
as buyers are not willing to expose
themselves to the additional SDLT liability.
So, we have a tax that provides little help
to first time buyers (particularly in certain
areas of the country) and one that has an
adverse effect on the market for certain
valued properties.
Not just on freeholds……..
As you are no doubt aware, SDLT also
applies on Leasehold interests, with
the Government ditching the relatively
straightforward rules under old Stamp
Duty, and introducing a mathematical
equation that Sir Isaac Newton would
have been proud of!!
The consideration that is chargeable
to SDLT is calculated by the Net Present
Value (NPV) of the future rents to be
received under the terms of the lease.
Any
resulting value that exceeds the nil rate
bands above, is charged at 1% on the
amounts above the nil rate band, not the
full amount as with freeholds. So, there is
a discrepancy even within the same tax!
Any premium received is treated separately
and is subject to SDLT in the same way as
for freeholds, except (just to make things
more complicated), that if the annual
rents exceed £600 per year, the nil rate
bands detailed above, do not apply.
So, for example, a lease with an annual
rent of £1,000, and a premium of
£50,000, would give rise to an SDLT
liability of £50 on the premium (1%).
Lessees beware!
Back to the charge on rent. Once the
NPV has been calculated, you would
be forgiven for thinking that the worst is
over. However, during the lease term, one
must consider whether there has been an
“abnormal” rent increase after the fifth
year, by using another mathematical
formula. If there has, the lessee needs
to re-compute the NPV to assess if there
should be additional SDLT to pay.
How HMRC are to police this, I am not
quite sure, although good luck to them,
because I find it difficult to believe that
even lessees will recognise that there may
be an additional liability.
Some relief……….
Disadvantaged Areas relief may still
benefit some homebuyers, in that the
nil rate band is increased to £150,000
where a residential property falls within a
“disadvantaged area”. A postcode search
on HMRC’s website can be used to find
out whether the home will qualify.
This used to be a much bigger benefit
when the nil rate band for residential
property was £60,000, but now that it is
at £125,000, the number of properties
that benefit has decreased significantly.
More relief – time to plan
So far, it has been pretty much doom
and gloom, but there is light at the end
of the tunnel. For properties valued over
£500,000, there is some hope. With a
little bit of planning, it may be possible
to significantly reduce the buyer’s SDLT
exposure. As with any planning, time is
of the essence, so it is important that, if it
is being considered, the appropriate steps
are put in place as soon as possible after
the offer has been accepted.
In the end………………
SDLT is seen by many as an unfair tax
- why pay tax on purchasing a property,
when you’ve already been taxed on the
money you are using to buy it? It is seen
by others as a curse on the housing market
at certain levels (£255,000 to £275,000
and £505,000 to £550,000). Some
(and probably far too many) sadly see it
as a barrier to buying the home that they
desperately want.
Forms of SDLT exist worldwide and our
top rate of 4% compares favourably to
other countries at 10%. However, it is
still a significant cost which, if planned for
carefully, could be significantly reduced.
SDLT – Caveat Emptor!
Nick Haines is a Tax Director at
Hazlewoods LLP, a firm of business
advisers and chartered accountants who
have a specialist team offering advice to
Estate Agents.
This article has been produced as a guide
to topics of current financial interests.
We strongly recommend that you take
professional advice before making
decisions on matters discussed here. No
responsibility for any loss to any person
acting as a result of this material can be
accepted by us.
For more information on SDLT
compliance or planning, contact
Nick Haines, on 01242 237661 or
nmh@hazlewoods.co.uk
The history behind and effect of Stamp Duty Land Tax