
Prior to April 2007, there was no
legislation governing the handling
of tenants’ deposits. On 6 April
2007, the Housing Act 2004
introduced tenancy deposit protection to
protect tenants’ deposits and ensure that
deposit disputes were dealt with as fairly
as possible. The provisions of the Act only
cover Assured Shorthold Tenancies
commencing on or after 6 April 2007.
If the property was let under any other
type of agreement, or a Periodic Statutory
Tenancy following an Assured Shorthold
Tenancy prior to 6 April 2007, the deposit
is not covered by these regulations.
Three companies were awarded
contracts to run a tenancy deposit
protection scheme. The Dispute Service
and Mydeposits.com run insurance based
schemes, (the agent or landlord retain the
deposit monies), the Deposit Protection
Service is a custodial deposit scheme, the
monies being paid into the scheme.
A number of complaints referred to my
office concern deposit related issues. It is
important for the agent or landlord that
receives the tenant’s deposit, to ensure that
the deposit is promptly registered with one
of the schemes. Failure to do so could
result in the landlord facing a fine of three
times the amount of the deposit and also
being unable to serve a section 21 Notice. I
have upheld a number of complaints where
the agent has failed to register the deposit
and the tenant has lost the opportunity to
refer a subsequent dispute to the scheme.
Where complaints about the handling
of tenancy deposits are referred to my
office (typically about deductions from the
deposit at the end of the term), it falls to
me to consider whether the agent has
breached the terms of their contract with
a landlord or the TPO Code of Practice.
This will not resolve the dispute over
proposed deductions from a deposit; that
is between landlord and tenant. Although
agents act on the behalf of landlords, the
fact that a landlord may not consent to the
return of a tenant’s deposit does not itself
make the agent responsible. Agents have
clear guidelines under the TPO Code of
Practice to ensure deposit negotiations
are fair and appropriately documented.
My consideration of such complaints
relates to aspects of an agent’s conduct
when dealing with the administration of
the deposit.
Specifically, I expect a member
agent to take their landlord client’s
instructions concerning any proposed
deductions from the deposit. The
undisputed amount of the deposit should
then be returned to the tenant within ten
working days. Having advised the agent
of proposed deductions, I do not consider
that a landlord can come back at a later
stage and request more monies for further
issues which were perhaps not initially
noted at check out and I will not criticise
an agent for already having returned the
deposit to the tenant. Following
negotiations, if the landlord and tenant do not agree on the deductions, details
of the dispute, together with the amount
of money in dispute (in respect of the
insurance based scheme) should then by
passed over to the deposit protection
scheme. The scheme will then consider the
issues raised and rule return of the deposit.
Complaints have been brought to this
office where the agent acting on the
landlord’s instructions has released the
deposit, or part thereof, to the landlord
following the end of the tenancy, as the
landlord considers that he is entitled to the
money. I do not expect an agent to release
any monies without the consent of both
parties. If he has done so, aware that the
tenant does not consent, it is likely that I
will make an award as the agent has acted
in breach of their obligations both under
the law and the TPO Code of Practice.
The tenant is then left having to pursue
the landlord through the courts for the
recovery of the deposit monies.
I have
made awards to compensate the tenant for
the distress and aggravation caused to him
by the agent’s actions and to try to return
him to the financial position that he would
have been in, had the agent acted correctly.
Finally, a number of complaints refer to
a party’s wish that unpaid rent can be paid
from the deposit. I do not expect this to
occur during the term of the tenancy,
unless the written consents of landlord
and tenant are obtained. Following the
termination of the tenancy agreement, the
landlord is permitted to recover unpaid
rent from the deposit. However, the tenant
should be informed of this action; if he
disputes the proposal, the matter must be
referred to the deposit protection scheme.