The property market is having a
dreadful time and property
portals have been no
exception. Internet research
company Comscore’s
December 2008 figures
showed portals’ traffic dropping 16 per
cent year-on-year, compared to growth in
overall web traffic of 11 per cent. Is it all up
for property portals?

Certainly there’s a lot of change
happening in the market. Alex
Chesterman, CEO of Zoopla (pictured right) says, “The
market is being transformed – there is a
shake-up happening.” Second generation portals, such as
Nestoria, Globrix, and Zoopla, are taking
an increasing share of traffic and moving
up the rankings – though the ‘gorilla’,
Rightmove, is still dominant. They’re
growing fast – March showed Zoopla increasing traffic by 26 per cent month-on-month,
with Nestoria and Globrix enjoying
15 and 18 per cent growth, against a
market average of just nine per cent.

But meanwhile, somde of the other first
generation portals – particularly
fish4homes and the Trinity Mirror
network – have been slipping. And the
NAEA’s own site hasn’t made inroads; it’s
still light on properties listed and hasn’t got
to the top ten in terms of traffic.
What’s particularly interesting is that
many of the second generation portals are
embracing new business models, rather
than the monthly-subscription listings
model used by Rightmove and others.
For instance Zoopla has evolved a payper-
lead model instead of fixed fees and
12-24 month contracts. The estate agent
lists properties for free and only pays if a
lead is generated.
“We give everything away for free, to a
certain extent,” says Globrix CEO Dan Lee.
He believes a portal needs a critical mass of
properties for consumers to be interested
in it, and the easiest way to get 100 per cent
coverage is to list for free. Admittedly, he
reckons at the moment he has 80-90 per
cent of all properties for sale in the UK
represented on the site. By listing them for
free, Globrix saves the cost of a sales team.

Globrix is funded by providing special
promotion services for agents and by
advertising for ancillary services such as
mortgages, conveyancing, insurance and
house moving. Dan points out that
Rightmove doesn’t do that, as it is
constrained by its relationship with agents.
It’s difficult to see what will threaten
Rightmove. In addition to being number
one in terms of web traffic, it’s also highly
profitable. Dan Lee says, “being on
Rightmove is a hygiene factor for the
agent” – even if it didn’t get them business,
the agent’s clients know the name and want
to see their agent is on Rightmove. And he
claims, “Rightmove’s business is
overpriced; if it wasn’t they wouldn’t be
making 52 per cent margins.”
Rightmove has also moved into the
lettings business – it’s increasing the
number of offices represented by 10 per
cent to 3,500 since the start of 2008. That’s
very much the trend for most UK portals,
which – like many agents – expect the
lettings market to be far more active than
sales in the near future.

But it does look likely that there will be
consolidation among some of the other
portals. Some has already happened –
2008 saw Findaproperty merge with Primelocation, as well as Hot Property
merging with Propertyfinder. June saw
REA Group announce Propertyfinder is
under review – it could be sold, or closed if
a buyer isn’t found, as it has been lossmaking
for some time.
Daniel Lee, CEO of Globrix, says the
news is interesting. “They were number
two or three, and it proves the first
generation model isn’t necessarily
sustainable.” He points out that if
Propertyfinder has been driving traffic by
pay-per-click marketing, it may have
generated web traffic too expensively. “If
you buy traffic in, you have to sell at a
higher price to make a profit; it’s a kind of
arbitrage really.”
He believes that over the next year,
Propertyfinder won’t be alone. “There’ll be
more closures and there will be smaller
sites starting up and closing down.”
Although there’s been significant price
pressure in the market, leading portals
don’t seem to have cut their rates. Digital
Property Group has changed its fee
structure to try to align rates more closely
to the value delivered, taking into account
the agent’s location and the number and
average value of the properties listed.
However some agents have said this
increases their fees up to 20 per cent,
though it is in others’ favour.

Martin Dell of Kyero, the Spanish
property portal, says he’s been able to
maintain prices too. “We’ve seen a lot of
price pressure in the last couple of years,”
he admits, “but our pitch is that we price
for what we deliver.” He’s lost very few
customers on price, though some have
gone out of business.
Most of the first generation of portals in
the UK have now begun to expand into
international property, though this still
accounts for only a small proportion of their total business. Otherwise, the market
is fragmented. For instance Kyero
competes mainly against ThinkSpain, as
well as UK portal Primelocation, but there
are numerous smaller portals selling
Spanish property to UK buyers. Idealista
and Fotocasa are the biggest in Spain, but
are hardly ever used by overseas buyers.

“There are a lot of also-rans,” Martin Dell
says. “They’re making money. None of
them are well funded; it’s just a
programmer and a guy on the phone
selling, so they can afford to be cheap.”
The larger international portals, on the
other hand, are now beginning to expand.
Kyero is building portals in a number of
other countries, though they will be
separately branded. But lack of data is a
problem in many countries, Martin Dell
complains. “The American and UK sites
are doing all the innovation; in overseas
markets it’s down to a lack of data.”
Portals are increasing their functionality
all the time. For instance, Alex Chesterman
says, Zoopla has gone beyond listings to
provide “a much wider experience”, looking
at all properties, not just those that are for
sale. That enables the site to attract a
different audience, including owners
checking the value of their property.
Other content is also being added,
including community features that will
enable consumers to contact professionals,
and neighbourhood information. All this
permanent content should help Zoopla
rate high on search engines. One of the
problems with the traditional listings
model is that listings are temporary, so
Google tends not to pick the data up.
Kyero has a number of features such as
pricing data and a ‘popularity’ score based
on various criteria, such as the proportion
of views to enquiries. These all add value to
the bare bones of the listings. So does a weekly newsletter and articles on various
topics. Content creation and search engine
optimisation accounts for over two-thirds
of Kyero’s cost base, a massive investment.
But after all, a large agent could
theoretically introduce all these bells and
whistles to its own coverage. When the
first generation portals started, many
agents had no web sites or very poor sites,
so the portal had major advantages. Now,
Dan Lee says, agents are beginning to
understand how to do their own online
marketing, with good sites and good search
engine optimisation. Even so, he thinks
agents benefit from using a portal.
But what can portals offer that agents
can’t? Martin Dell believes portals can help
offer impartiality and transparency, which
is particularly important to buyers of
overseas property. The advantage to the
agent is that educated customers will
create the best qualified leads, though he
admits some agents still don’t like to use
Kyero’s price guide.
“Asking an estate agent about value –
he’s not the best man for the job!” Martin
jokes. “With so much information available
on the internet, the agent doesn’t set the
price, it’s the market that sets the price.”
He’s also proud that the Kyero newsletter
tells the bald truth about what’s happening
in the Spanish property market. “We’re not
here to pitch, to sell; we’re impartial.”
Agents will also find it difficult to
compete with portals in terms of the sheer
size of investment in technology and
content. The top ten portals can outspend
any agent, even the biggest. Dan Lee says
“Lots of people underestimate how much
money and time it takes to run a proper
portal. It’s a million a year before you get
out of bed.”
Portals live and breathe
the internet, leaving agents to concentrate
on selling properties. Besides, portals tend to dominate the
search engine result pages. It’s difficult for
an agent to get such good results on its
own.

Many of the newer portals get most of
their traffic through SEO [search engine optimisation - making their sites and brands easily 'findable' by Google and Yahoo etc] and don’t run
conventional advertising campaigns.
However John Notley, sales director at
Digital Property Group, says agents
shouldn’t underestimate the importance of
branding. “Brand searches are pretty
significant,” he says. Users will often google
the portal they want.
To get an idea of the importance of
portals, look at BrightSale’s figures. In
November 2008, 28 per cent of its business
came from direct searches, but 63 per cent
from portals. Going it alone, BrightSale
would lose two-thirds of its business.
Portals greatly increase the size of an
agent’s footprint on the internet, and
increase its reach.
Alex Chesterman says, “An agent’s
toolkit really needs to combine multiple
routes to attract leads” both online and
offline, including both portals and its own
site. He points out that many users are
faithful to just one portal, so that “if agents
want to attract the widest possible
audience, it makes sense to be on more
than one portal.”
DPG’s Insight is another useful tool for
agents, giving each agent a view of how
their properties are doing on the site. John
Notley says, “It hands agents a level of
analysis that they haven’t had before. They
no longer have to have a hunch about
what’s the most popular type of property in
their area – we can tell them.”

Agents are becoming more selective,
though. BrightSale has actually withdrawn
from Rightmove; other agents have
trimmed the number of portals they are
spending on. Dan Lee says many agents are
becoming more aware of the distinctions
between different online presences.
“They’re taking more control of where they
put their properties, though they don’t
want to be beholden to a single source.”
Rightmove’s recent results showed the
number of advertisers unchanged, and
average spend per advertiser actually
increasing. The largest agents – Halifax,
Countrywide, Connells, and LSL – have all
renewed their contracts. Some agents may
be cutting their presence on third tier
portals in order to focus on the most
important sites.
But another reason for the buoyancy of
Rightmove’s results is the overall swing
from offline to online spending. Alex
Chesterman says, “Agents are putting more
online than they were historically. It’s the
offline spend that has really taken a hit.” He
thinks online marketing took a 25 per cent
share of estate agents’ budgets before the
recession, but it will take three-quarters of
their marketing spend by the time we
emerge from the downturn.
There’s a good reason for this. Cost per
lead is lower and the results are also more
trackable and easier to manage. While
print media cost per lead is around £50
according to some agents, figures from
GCG Consulting show costs mainly in the
region of £3 to £5. The second generation
are even cheaper: £1 per lead at Zoopla
and a big fat zero at Globrix.
It’s not surprising then that the value of
property ads in local papers has halved, as
shown in recent results from DMGT
(Northcliffe) and Trinity Mirror. Dan Lee
also points out local newspapers’ property
web sites can often only show a couple of
thousand users, “That’s not really worth
anything,” he says. “You need the eyeballs.”
Newspapers are trying to use digital to
prop up print, but it may not work.
It’s an interesting time in the world of the
portals. Not all will survive, that’s certain,
but some will thrive. And as Martin Dell
points out, “Agents just want leads.” Portals
appear to be an increasingly good way of
providing those leads, giving agents not
just buyers, but vendors too.” As long as
portals are value for money,” Martin says,
“agents will continue to use them.”
1 Comments Posted Leave a comment